Skip to content

Conversation

@bwendling
Copy link
Collaborator

Only FieldDecls are important when determining GEP indices. A struct defined within another struct has the same semantics as if it were defined outside of the struct. So there's no need to look into RecordDecls that aren't a field.

See commit 5bcf31e ("[Clang] Loop over FieldDecls instead of all Decls (#89453)")

Fixes 2039.

Only FieldDecls are important when determining GEP indices. A struct
defined within another struct has the same semantics as if it were
defined outside of the struct. So there's no need to look into
RecordDecls that aren't a field.

See commit 5bcf31e ("[Clang] Loop over FieldDecls instead of all Decls (llvm#89453)")

Fixes 2039.
@bwendling bwendling requested a review from AaronBallman July 18, 2024 21:40
@llvmbot llvmbot added clang Clang issues not falling into any other category clang:codegen IR generation bugs: mangling, exceptions, etc. labels Jul 18, 2024
@bwendling bwendling requested a review from efriedma-quic July 18, 2024 21:40
@llvmbot
Copy link
Member

llvmbot commented Jul 18, 2024

@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang

@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-codegen

Author: Bill Wendling (bwendling)

Changes

Only FieldDecls are important when determining GEP indices. A struct defined within another struct has the same semantics as if it were defined outside of the struct. So there's no need to look into RecordDecls that aren't a field.

See commit 5bcf31e ("[Clang] Loop over FieldDecls instead of all Decls (#89453)")

Fixes 2039.


Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/99574.diff

2 Files Affected:

  • (modified) clang/lib/CodeGen/CGExpr.cpp (+9-11)
  • (modified) clang/test/CodeGen/attr-counted-by.c (+54)
diff --git a/clang/lib/CodeGen/CGExpr.cpp b/clang/lib/CodeGen/CGExpr.cpp
index 6a0af00b9e186..69fa05e7a94ea 100644
--- a/clang/lib/CodeGen/CGExpr.cpp
+++ b/clang/lib/CodeGen/CGExpr.cpp
@@ -1071,21 +1071,19 @@ using RecIndicesTy =
     SmallVector<std::pair<const RecordDecl *, llvm::Value *>, 8>;
 
 static bool getGEPIndicesToField(CodeGenFunction &CGF, const RecordDecl *RD,
-                                 const FieldDecl *FD, RecIndicesTy &Indices) {
+                                 const FieldDecl *Field, RecIndicesTy &Indices) {
   const CGRecordLayout &Layout = CGF.CGM.getTypes().getCGRecordLayout(RD);
   int64_t FieldNo = -1;
-  for (const Decl *D : RD->decls()) {
-    if (const auto *Field = dyn_cast<FieldDecl>(D)) {
-      FieldNo = Layout.getLLVMFieldNo(Field);
-      if (FD == Field) {
-        Indices.emplace_back(std::make_pair(RD, CGF.Builder.getInt32(FieldNo)));
-        return true;
-      }
+  for (const FieldDecl *FD : RD->fields()) {
+    FieldNo = Layout.getLLVMFieldNo(FD);
+    if (FD == Field) {
+      Indices.emplace_back(std::make_pair(RD, CGF.Builder.getInt32(FieldNo)));
+      return true;
     }
 
-    if (const auto *Record = dyn_cast<RecordDecl>(D)) {
-      ++FieldNo;
-      if (getGEPIndicesToField(CGF, Record, FD, Indices)) {
+    QualType Ty = FD->getType();
+    if (Ty->isRecordType()) {
+      if (getGEPIndicesToField(CGF, Ty->getAsRecordDecl(), Field, Indices)) {
         if (RD->isUnion())
           FieldNo = 0;
         Indices.emplace_back(std::make_pair(RD, CGF.Builder.getInt32(FieldNo)));
diff --git a/clang/test/CodeGen/attr-counted-by.c b/clang/test/CodeGen/attr-counted-by.c
index 79922eb4159f1..32db136076d7d 100644
--- a/clang/test/CodeGen/attr-counted-by.c
+++ b/clang/test/CodeGen/attr-counted-by.c
@@ -1852,3 +1852,57 @@ struct annotated_struct_array {
 void test29(struct annotated_struct_array *ann, int idx1, int idx2) {
   ann->ann_array[idx1]->array[idx2] = __builtin_dynamic_object_size(ann->ann_array[idx1]->array, 1);
 }
+
+typedef struct {
+  char __padding[0];
+} test30_spinlock_t;
+
+struct test30_struct {
+  struct test30_decl *name_node;
+  int priv_len;
+  test30_spinlock_t pcpu_refcnt;
+  char priv[] __counted_by(priv_len);
+};
+
+// SANITIZE-WITH-ATTR-LABEL: define dso_local void @test30(
+// SANITIZE-WITH-ATTR-SAME: ptr noundef [[PTR:%.*]], i32 noundef [[IDX:%.*]]) local_unnamed_addr #[[ATTR5]] {
+// SANITIZE-WITH-ATTR-NEXT:  entry:
+// SANITIZE-WITH-ATTR-NEXT:    [[TMP0:%.*]] = zext i32 [[IDX]] to i64, !nosanitize [[META2]]
+// SANITIZE-WITH-ATTR-NEXT:    tail call void @__ubsan_handle_out_of_bounds_abort(ptr nonnull @[[GLOB39:[0-9]+]], i64 [[TMP0]]) #[[ATTR10]], !nosanitize [[META2]]
+// SANITIZE-WITH-ATTR-NEXT:    unreachable, !nosanitize [[META2]]
+//
+// NO-SANITIZE-WITH-ATTR-LABEL: define dso_local void @test30(
+// NO-SANITIZE-WITH-ATTR-SAME: ptr nocapture noundef [[PTR:%.*]], i32 noundef [[IDX:%.*]]) local_unnamed_addr #[[ATTR1]] {
+// NO-SANITIZE-WITH-ATTR-NEXT:  entry:
+// NO-SANITIZE-WITH-ATTR-NEXT:    [[DOT_COUNTED_BY_GEP:%.*]] = getelementptr inbounds i8, ptr [[PTR]], i64 8
+// NO-SANITIZE-WITH-ATTR-NEXT:    [[DOT_COUNTED_BY_LOAD:%.*]] = load i32, ptr [[DOT_COUNTED_BY_GEP]], align 4
+// NO-SANITIZE-WITH-ATTR-NEXT:    [[TMP0:%.*]] = tail call i32 @llvm.smax.i32(i32 [[DOT_COUNTED_BY_LOAD]], i32 4)
+// NO-SANITIZE-WITH-ATTR-NEXT:    [[DOTINV:%.*]] = icmp slt i32 [[DOT_COUNTED_BY_LOAD]], 0
+// NO-SANITIZE-WITH-ATTR-NEXT:    [[TMP1:%.*]] = trunc i32 [[TMP0]] to i8
+// NO-SANITIZE-WITH-ATTR-NEXT:    [[TMP2:%.*]] = add i8 [[TMP1]], 12
+// NO-SANITIZE-WITH-ATTR-NEXT:    [[CONV:%.*]] = select i1 [[DOTINV]], i8 0, i8 [[TMP2]]
+// NO-SANITIZE-WITH-ATTR-NEXT:    [[PCPU_REFCNT:%.*]] = getelementptr inbounds i8, ptr [[PTR]], i64 12
+// NO-SANITIZE-WITH-ATTR-NEXT:    [[IDXPROM:%.*]] = sext i32 [[IDX]] to i64
+// NO-SANITIZE-WITH-ATTR-NEXT:    [[ARRAYIDX:%.*]] = getelementptr inbounds [0 x i8], ptr [[PCPU_REFCNT]], i64 0, i64 [[IDXPROM]]
+// NO-SANITIZE-WITH-ATTR-NEXT:    store i8 [[CONV]], ptr [[ARRAYIDX]], align 1, !tbaa [[TBAA6]]
+// NO-SANITIZE-WITH-ATTR-NEXT:    ret void
+//
+// SANITIZE-WITHOUT-ATTR-LABEL: define dso_local void @test30(
+// SANITIZE-WITHOUT-ATTR-SAME: ptr noundef [[PTR:%.*]], i32 noundef [[IDX:%.*]]) local_unnamed_addr #[[ATTR3]] {
+// SANITIZE-WITHOUT-ATTR-NEXT:  entry:
+// SANITIZE-WITHOUT-ATTR-NEXT:    [[TMP0:%.*]] = zext i32 [[IDX]] to i64, !nosanitize [[META9]]
+// SANITIZE-WITHOUT-ATTR-NEXT:    tail call void @__ubsan_handle_out_of_bounds_abort(ptr nonnull @[[GLOB15:[0-9]+]], i64 [[TMP0]]) #[[ATTR8]], !nosanitize [[META9]]
+// SANITIZE-WITHOUT-ATTR-NEXT:    unreachable, !nosanitize [[META9]]
+//
+// NO-SANITIZE-WITHOUT-ATTR-LABEL: define dso_local void @test30(
+// NO-SANITIZE-WITHOUT-ATTR-SAME: ptr noundef [[PTR:%.*]], i32 noundef [[IDX:%.*]]) local_unnamed_addr #[[ATTR0]] {
+// NO-SANITIZE-WITHOUT-ATTR-NEXT:  entry:
+// NO-SANITIZE-WITHOUT-ATTR-NEXT:    [[PCPU_REFCNT:%.*]] = getelementptr inbounds i8, ptr [[PTR]], i64 12
+// NO-SANITIZE-WITHOUT-ATTR-NEXT:    [[IDXPROM:%.*]] = sext i32 [[IDX]] to i64
+// NO-SANITIZE-WITHOUT-ATTR-NEXT:    [[ARRAYIDX:%.*]] = getelementptr inbounds [0 x i8], ptr [[PCPU_REFCNT]], i64 0, i64 [[IDXPROM]]
+// NO-SANITIZE-WITHOUT-ATTR-NEXT:    store i8 -1, ptr [[ARRAYIDX]], align 1, !tbaa [[TBAA6]]
+// NO-SANITIZE-WITHOUT-ATTR-NEXT:    ret void
+//
+void test30(struct test30_struct *ptr, int idx) {
+  ptr->pcpu_refcnt.__padding[idx] = __builtin_dynamic_object_size(ptr, 1);
+}

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jul 18, 2024

✅ With the latest revision this PR passed the C/C++ code formatter.

Copy link
Collaborator

@efriedma-quic efriedma-quic left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@bwendling bwendling merged commit 1f6f97e into llvm:main Jul 18, 2024
@bwendling bwendling deleted the counted-by-fix branch July 18, 2024 22:12
@llvm-ci
Copy link
Collaborator

llvm-ci commented Jul 18, 2024

LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder sanitizer-aarch64-linux running on sanitizer-buildbot8 while building clang at step 2 "annotate".

Full details are available at: https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/51/builds/1493

Here is the relevant piece of the build log for the reference:

Step 2 (annotate) failure: 'python ../sanitizer_buildbot/sanitizers/zorg/buildbot/builders/sanitizers/buildbot_selector.py' (failure)
...
[159/163] Generating MSAN_INST_TEST_OBJECTS.msan_test.cpp.aarch64-with-call.o
[160/163] Generating Msan-aarch64-with-call-Test
[161/163] Generating MSAN_INST_TEST_OBJECTS.msan_test.cpp.aarch64.o
[162/163] Generating Msan-aarch64-Test
[162/163] Running compiler_rt regression tests
llvm-lit: /b/sanitizer-aarch64-linux/build/llvm-project/llvm/utils/lit/lit/discovery.py:276: warning: input '/b/sanitizer-aarch64-linux/build/build_default/runtimes/runtimes-bins/compiler-rt/test/interception/Unit' contained no tests
llvm-lit: /b/sanitizer-aarch64-linux/build/llvm-project/llvm/utils/lit/lit/discovery.py:276: warning: input '/b/sanitizer-aarch64-linux/build/build_default/runtimes/runtimes-bins/compiler-rt/test/sanitizer_common/Unit' contained no tests
llvm-lit: /b/sanitizer-aarch64-linux/build/llvm-project/llvm/utils/lit/lit/main.py:72: note: The test suite configuration requested an individual test timeout of 0 seconds but a timeout of 900 seconds was requested on the command line. Forcing timeout to be 900 seconds.
-- Testing: 5484 tests, 48 workers --
Testing:  0.. 10.. 20.. 30
FAIL: LeakSanitizer-AddressSanitizer-aarch64 :: TestCases/use_registers.cpp (1772 of 5484)
******************** TEST 'LeakSanitizer-AddressSanitizer-aarch64 :: TestCases/use_registers.cpp' FAILED ********************
Exit Code: 1

Command Output (stdout):
--
Test alloc: 0x51a000000080 

=================================================================
==1493974==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks

Direct leak of 1337 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
    #0 0xc47b359d14d4 in malloc /b/sanitizer-aarch64-linux/build/llvm-project/compiler-rt/lib/asan/asan_malloc_linux.cpp:68:3
    #1 0xc47b35a10db0 in registers_thread_func /b/sanitizer-aarch64-linux/build/llvm-project/compiler-rt/test/lsan/TestCases/use_registers.cpp:16:13
    #2 0xc47b359ced40 in asan_thread_start(void*) /b/sanitizer-aarch64-linux/build/llvm-project/compiler-rt/lib/asan/asan_interceptors.cpp:239:28
    #3 0xeb3fc640ba48  (/lib/aarch64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0xeba48) (BuildId: 3119d7bcf68a34e21742cd08095272de601d373f)

Objects leaked above:
0x51a000000080 (1337 bytes)

SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: 1337 byte(s) leaked in 1 allocation(s).

--
Command Output (stderr):
--
RUN: at line 2: /b/sanitizer-aarch64-linux/build/build_default/./bin/clang  --driver-mode=g++ -O0   -Wthread-safety -Wthread-safety-reference -Wthread-safety-beta   -gline-tables-only -fsanitize=address -I/b/sanitizer-aarch64-linux/build/llvm-project/compiler-rt/test/lsan/../ -pthread /b/sanitizer-aarch64-linux/build/llvm-project/compiler-rt/test/lsan/TestCases/use_registers.cpp -o /b/sanitizer-aarch64-linux/build/build_default/runtimes/runtimes-bins/compiler-rt/test/lsan/AARCH64AsanConfig/TestCases/Output/use_registers.cpp.tmp
+ /b/sanitizer-aarch64-linux/build/build_default/./bin/clang --driver-mode=g++ -O0 -Wthread-safety -Wthread-safety-reference -Wthread-safety-beta -gline-tables-only -fsanitize=address -I/b/sanitizer-aarch64-linux/build/llvm-project/compiler-rt/test/lsan/../ -pthread /b/sanitizer-aarch64-linux/build/llvm-project/compiler-rt/test/lsan/TestCases/use_registers.cpp -o /b/sanitizer-aarch64-linux/build/build_default/runtimes/runtimes-bins/compiler-rt/test/lsan/AARCH64AsanConfig/TestCases/Output/use_registers.cpp.tmp
RUN: at line 3: env LSAN_OPTIONS=:detect_leaks=1:"report_objects=1:use_stacks=0:use_registers=0" not  /b/sanitizer-aarch64-linux/build/build_default/runtimes/runtimes-bins/compiler-rt/test/lsan/AARCH64AsanConfig/TestCases/Output/use_registers.cpp.tmp 2>&1 | FileCheck /b/sanitizer-aarch64-linux/build/llvm-project/compiler-rt/test/lsan/TestCases/use_registers.cpp
+ env LSAN_OPTIONS=:detect_leaks=1:report_objects=1:use_stacks=0:use_registers=0 not /b/sanitizer-aarch64-linux/build/build_default/runtimes/runtimes-bins/compiler-rt/test/lsan/AARCH64AsanConfig/TestCases/Output/use_registers.cpp.tmp
+ FileCheck /b/sanitizer-aarch64-linux/build/llvm-project/compiler-rt/test/lsan/TestCases/use_registers.cpp
RUN: at line 4: env LSAN_OPTIONS=:detect_leaks=1:"report_objects=1:use_stacks=0:use_registers=1"  /b/sanitizer-aarch64-linux/build/build_default/runtimes/runtimes-bins/compiler-rt/test/lsan/AARCH64AsanConfig/TestCases/Output/use_registers.cpp.tmp 2>&1
+ env LSAN_OPTIONS=:detect_leaks=1:report_objects=1:use_stacks=0:use_registers=1 /b/sanitizer-aarch64-linux/build/build_default/runtimes/runtimes-bins/compiler-rt/test/lsan/AARCH64AsanConfig/TestCases/Output/use_registers.cpp.tmp

--

********************
Testing:  0.. 10.. 20.. 30.. 40.. 50.. 60.. 70.. 80.. 90.. 

2 warning(s) in tests
Step 14 (test compiler-rt default) failure: test compiler-rt default (failure)
...
[159/163] Generating MSAN_INST_TEST_OBJECTS.msan_test.cpp.aarch64-with-call.o
[160/163] Generating Msan-aarch64-with-call-Test
[161/163] Generating MSAN_INST_TEST_OBJECTS.msan_test.cpp.aarch64.o
[162/163] Generating Msan-aarch64-Test
[162/163] Running compiler_rt regression tests
llvm-lit: /b/sanitizer-aarch64-linux/build/llvm-project/llvm/utils/lit/lit/discovery.py:276: warning: input '/b/sanitizer-aarch64-linux/build/build_default/runtimes/runtimes-bins/compiler-rt/test/interception/Unit' contained no tests
llvm-lit: /b/sanitizer-aarch64-linux/build/llvm-project/llvm/utils/lit/lit/discovery.py:276: warning: input '/b/sanitizer-aarch64-linux/build/build_default/runtimes/runtimes-bins/compiler-rt/test/sanitizer_common/Unit' contained no tests
llvm-lit: /b/sanitizer-aarch64-linux/build/llvm-project/llvm/utils/lit/lit/main.py:72: note: The test suite configuration requested an individual test timeout of 0 seconds but a timeout of 900 seconds was requested on the command line. Forcing timeout to be 900 seconds.
-- Testing: 5484 tests, 48 workers --
Testing:  0.. 10.. 20.. 30
FAIL: LeakSanitizer-AddressSanitizer-aarch64 :: TestCases/use_registers.cpp (1772 of 5484)
******************** TEST 'LeakSanitizer-AddressSanitizer-aarch64 :: TestCases/use_registers.cpp' FAILED ********************
Exit Code: 1

Command Output (stdout):
--
Test alloc: 0x51a000000080 

=================================================================
==1493974==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks

Direct leak of 1337 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
    #0 0xc47b359d14d4 in malloc /b/sanitizer-aarch64-linux/build/llvm-project/compiler-rt/lib/asan/asan_malloc_linux.cpp:68:3
    #1 0xc47b35a10db0 in registers_thread_func /b/sanitizer-aarch64-linux/build/llvm-project/compiler-rt/test/lsan/TestCases/use_registers.cpp:16:13
    #2 0xc47b359ced40 in asan_thread_start(void*) /b/sanitizer-aarch64-linux/build/llvm-project/compiler-rt/lib/asan/asan_interceptors.cpp:239:28
    #3 0xeb3fc640ba48  (/lib/aarch64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0xeba48) (BuildId: 3119d7bcf68a34e21742cd08095272de601d373f)

Objects leaked above:
0x51a000000080 (1337 bytes)

SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: 1337 byte(s) leaked in 1 allocation(s).

--
Command Output (stderr):
--
RUN: at line 2: /b/sanitizer-aarch64-linux/build/build_default/./bin/clang  --driver-mode=g++ -O0   -Wthread-safety -Wthread-safety-reference -Wthread-safety-beta   -gline-tables-only -fsanitize=address -I/b/sanitizer-aarch64-linux/build/llvm-project/compiler-rt/test/lsan/../ -pthread /b/sanitizer-aarch64-linux/build/llvm-project/compiler-rt/test/lsan/TestCases/use_registers.cpp -o /b/sanitizer-aarch64-linux/build/build_default/runtimes/runtimes-bins/compiler-rt/test/lsan/AARCH64AsanConfig/TestCases/Output/use_registers.cpp.tmp
+ /b/sanitizer-aarch64-linux/build/build_default/./bin/clang --driver-mode=g++ -O0 -Wthread-safety -Wthread-safety-reference -Wthread-safety-beta -gline-tables-only -fsanitize=address -I/b/sanitizer-aarch64-linux/build/llvm-project/compiler-rt/test/lsan/../ -pthread /b/sanitizer-aarch64-linux/build/llvm-project/compiler-rt/test/lsan/TestCases/use_registers.cpp -o /b/sanitizer-aarch64-linux/build/build_default/runtimes/runtimes-bins/compiler-rt/test/lsan/AARCH64AsanConfig/TestCases/Output/use_registers.cpp.tmp
RUN: at line 3: env LSAN_OPTIONS=:detect_leaks=1:"report_objects=1:use_stacks=0:use_registers=0" not  /b/sanitizer-aarch64-linux/build/build_default/runtimes/runtimes-bins/compiler-rt/test/lsan/AARCH64AsanConfig/TestCases/Output/use_registers.cpp.tmp 2>&1 | FileCheck /b/sanitizer-aarch64-linux/build/llvm-project/compiler-rt/test/lsan/TestCases/use_registers.cpp
+ env LSAN_OPTIONS=:detect_leaks=1:report_objects=1:use_stacks=0:use_registers=0 not /b/sanitizer-aarch64-linux/build/build_default/runtimes/runtimes-bins/compiler-rt/test/lsan/AARCH64AsanConfig/TestCases/Output/use_registers.cpp.tmp
+ FileCheck /b/sanitizer-aarch64-linux/build/llvm-project/compiler-rt/test/lsan/TestCases/use_registers.cpp
RUN: at line 4: env LSAN_OPTIONS=:detect_leaks=1:"report_objects=1:use_stacks=0:use_registers=1"  /b/sanitizer-aarch64-linux/build/build_default/runtimes/runtimes-bins/compiler-rt/test/lsan/AARCH64AsanConfig/TestCases/Output/use_registers.cpp.tmp 2>&1
+ env LSAN_OPTIONS=:detect_leaks=1:report_objects=1:use_stacks=0:use_registers=1 /b/sanitizer-aarch64-linux/build/build_default/runtimes/runtimes-bins/compiler-rt/test/lsan/AARCH64AsanConfig/TestCases/Output/use_registers.cpp.tmp

--

********************
Testing:  0.. 10.. 20.. 30.. 40.. 50.. 60.. 70.. 80.. 90..

2 warning(s) in tests

@nathanchance
Copy link
Member

I see a crash in drivers/thermal/thermal_core.c in Linux kernels without commit daeeb032f42d ("thermal: core: Move threshold out of struct thermal_trip") after this change. cvise spits out:

struct swait_queue_head {};
struct completion {
  int done;
  struct swait_queue_head wait;
};
struct {
  struct completion removal;
  int num_trips;
  int trips[] __attribute__((__counted_by__(num_trips)));
} *thermal_zone_device_register_with_trips_tz;
int thermal_zone_device_register_with_trips() {
  if (thermal_zone_device_register_with_trips_tz)
    goto free_tz;
  if (0)
    goto free_tzp;
  {
    long __p_size_field = __builtin_dynamic_object_size(
        thermal_zone_device_register_with_trips_tz, 1);
    _Bool __ret_do_once = __p_size_field, __ret_cond = __ret_do_once;
    static _Bool __already_done;
    if (__builtin_expect(__ret_cond && __already_done, 0))
      ;
  }
free_tzp:
free_tz:
  return 0;
}
$ clang -c -o /dev/null thermal_core.i
clang: /home/nathan/tmp/cvise.YrEYUS5WBZ/src/clang/lib/CodeGen/CGRecordLayout.h:200: unsigned int clang::CodeGen::CGRecordLayout::getLLVMFieldNo(const FieldDecl *) const: Assertion `FieldInfo.count(FD) && "Invalid field for record!"' failed.
PLEASE submit a bug report to https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/ and include the crash backtrace, preprocessed source, and associated run script.
Stack dump:
0.	Program arguments: clang -c -o /dev/null thermal_core.i
1.	<eof> parser at end of file
2.	thermal_core.i:11:5: LLVM IR generation of declaration 'thermal_zone_device_register_with_trips'
3.	thermal_core.i:11:5: Generating code for declaration 'thermal_zone_device_register_with_trips'
4.	thermal_core.i:16:3: LLVM IR generation of compound statement ('{}')
 #0 0x00005585369d0446 llvm::sys::PrintStackTrace(llvm::raw_ostream&, int) (/home/nathan/tmp/cvise.YrEYUS5WBZ/install/llvm-bad/bin/clang-19+0x55fc446)
 #1 0x00005585369cdf0e llvm::sys::RunSignalHandlers() (/home/nathan/tmp/cvise.YrEYUS5WBZ/install/llvm-bad/bin/clang-19+0x55f9f0e)
 #2 0x00005585369513ad CrashRecoverySignalHandler(int) CrashRecoveryContext.cpp:0:0
 #3 0x00007f3d209bdae0 (/usr/lib/libc.so.6+0x3cae0)
 #4 0x00007f3d20a15e44 (/usr/lib/libc.so.6+0x94e44)
 #5 0x00007f3d209bda30 raise (/usr/lib/libc.so.6+0x3ca30)
 #6 0x00007f3d209a54c3 abort (/usr/lib/libc.so.6+0x244c3)
 #7 0x00007f3d209a53df (/usr/lib/libc.so.6+0x243df)
 #8 0x00007f3d209b5c67 (/usr/lib/libc.so.6+0x34c67)
 #9 0x0000558536de6281 clang::CodeGen::CGRecordLayout::getLLVMFieldNo(clang::FieldDecl const*) const CGExpr.cpp:0:0
#10 0x0000558536dcd526 getGEPIndicesToField(clang::CodeGen::CodeGenFunction&, clang::RecordDecl const*, clang::FieldDecl const*, llvm::SmallVector<std::pair<clang::RecordDecl const*, llvm::Value*>, 8u>&) CGExpr.cpp:0:0
#11 0x0000558536dcd581 getGEPIndicesToField(clang::CodeGen::CodeGenFunction&, clang::RecordDecl const*, clang::FieldDecl const*, llvm::SmallVector<std::pair<clang::RecordDecl const*, llvm::Value*>, 8u>&) CGExpr.cpp:0:0
#12 0x0000558536dca542 clang::CodeGen::CodeGenFunction::EmitCountedByFieldExpr(clang::Expr const*, clang::FieldDecl const*, clang::FieldDecl const*) (/home/nathan/tmp/cvise.YrEYUS5WBZ/install/llvm-bad/bin/clang-19+0x59f6542)
#13 0x0000558536fb0927 clang::CodeGen::CodeGenFunction::emitFlexibleArrayMemberSize(clang::Expr const*, unsigned int, llvm::IntegerType*) (/home/nathan/tmp/cvise.YrEYUS5WBZ/install/llvm-bad/bin/clang-19+0x5bdc927)
#14 0x0000558536fafdf8 clang::CodeGen::CodeGenFunction::emitBuiltinObjectSize(clang::Expr const*, unsigned int, llvm::IntegerType*, llvm::Value*, bool) (/home/nathan/tmp/cvise.YrEYUS5WBZ/install/llvm-bad/bin/clang-19+0x5bdbdf8)
#15 0x0000558536fb9cfc clang::CodeGen::CodeGenFunction::EmitBuiltinExpr(clang::GlobalDecl, unsigned int, clang::CallExpr const*, clang::CodeGen::ReturnValueSlot) (/home/nathan/tmp/cvise.YrEYUS5WBZ/install/llvm-bad/bin/clang-19+0x5be5cfc)
#16 0x0000558536de827c clang::CodeGen::CodeGenFunction::EmitCallExpr(clang::CallExpr const*, clang::CodeGen::ReturnValueSlot) (/home/nathan/tmp/cvise.YrEYUS5WBZ/install/llvm-bad/bin/clang-19+0x5a1427c)
#17 0x0000558536e024cb (anonymous namespace)::ScalarExprEmitter::VisitCallExpr(clang::CallExpr const*) CGExprScalar.cpp:0:0
#18 0x0000558536dee27b (anonymous namespace)::ScalarExprEmitter::Visit(clang::Expr*) CGExprScalar.cpp:0:0
#19 0x0000558536e0bedd (anonymous namespace)::ScalarExprEmitter::VisitCastExpr(clang::CastExpr*) CGExprScalar.cpp:0:0
#20 0x0000558536dee11c clang::CodeGen::CodeGenFunction::EmitScalarExpr(clang::Expr const*, bool) (/home/nathan/tmp/cvise.YrEYUS5WBZ/install/llvm-bad/bin/clang-19+0x5a1a11c)
#21 0x0000558536e301e4 clang::CodeGen::CodeGenFunction::EmitScalarInit(clang::Expr const*, clang::ValueDecl const*, clang::CodeGen::LValue, bool) (/home/nathan/tmp/cvise.YrEYUS5WBZ/install/llvm-bad/bin/clang-19+0x5a5c1e4)
#22 0x0000558536e335d1 clang::CodeGen::CodeGenFunction::EmitAutoVarInit(clang::CodeGen::CodeGenFunction::AutoVarEmission const&) (/home/nathan/tmp/cvise.YrEYUS5WBZ/install/llvm-bad/bin/clang-19+0x5a5f5d1)
#23 0x0000558536e2da7d clang::CodeGen::CodeGenFunction::EmitVarDecl(clang::VarDecl const&) (/home/nathan/tmp/cvise.YrEYUS5WBZ/install/llvm-bad/bin/clang-19+0x5a59a7d)
#24 0x0000558536e2d4b7 clang::CodeGen::CodeGenFunction::EmitDecl(clang::Decl const&) (/home/nathan/tmp/cvise.YrEYUS5WBZ/install/llvm-bad/bin/clang-19+0x5a594b7)
#25 0x0000558536d66ddb clang::CodeGen::CodeGenFunction::EmitDeclStmt(clang::DeclStmt const&) (/home/nathan/tmp/cvise.YrEYUS5WBZ/install/llvm-bad/bin/clang-19+0x5992ddb)
#26 0x0000558536d59acb clang::CodeGen::CodeGenFunction::EmitSimpleStmt(clang::Stmt const*, llvm::ArrayRef<clang::Attr const*>) (/home/nathan/tmp/cvise.YrEYUS5WBZ/install/llvm-bad/bin/clang-19+0x5985acb)
#27 0x0000558536d58b33 clang::CodeGen::CodeGenFunction::EmitStmt(clang::Stmt const*, llvm::ArrayRef<clang::Attr const*>) (/home/nathan/tmp/cvise.YrEYUS5WBZ/install/llvm-bad/bin/clang-19+0x5984b33)
#28 0x0000558536d59aa1 clang::CodeGen::CodeGenFunction::EmitSimpleStmt(clang::Stmt const*, llvm::ArrayRef<clang::Attr const*>) (/home/nathan/tmp/cvise.YrEYUS5WBZ/install/llvm-bad/bin/clang-19+0x5985aa1)
#29 0x0000558536d58b33 clang::CodeGen::CodeGenFunction::EmitStmt(clang::Stmt const*, llvm::ArrayRef<clang::Attr const*>) (/home/nathan/tmp/cvise.YrEYUS5WBZ/install/llvm-bad/bin/clang-19+0x5984b33)
#30 0x0000558536d67f40 clang::CodeGen::CodeGenFunction::EmitCompoundStmtWithoutScope(clang::CompoundStmt const&, bool, clang::CodeGen::AggValueSlot) (/home/nathan/tmp/cvise.YrEYUS5WBZ/install/llvm-bad/bin/clang-19+0x5993f40)
#31 0x0000558536d44ee6 clang::CodeGen::CodeGenFunction::GenerateCode(clang::GlobalDecl, llvm::Function*, clang::CodeGen::CGFunctionInfo const&) (/home/nathan/tmp/cvise.YrEYUS5WBZ/install/llvm-bad/bin/clang-19+0x5970ee6)
#32 0x0000558536bfb47b clang::CodeGen::CodeGenModule::EmitGlobalFunctionDefinition(clang::GlobalDecl, llvm::GlobalValue*) (/home/nathan/tmp/cvise.YrEYUS5WBZ/install/llvm-bad/bin/clang-19+0x582747b)
#33 0x0000558536bf2a75 clang::CodeGen::CodeGenModule::EmitGlobalDefinition(clang::GlobalDecl, llvm::GlobalValue*) (/home/nathan/tmp/cvise.YrEYUS5WBZ/install/llvm-bad/bin/clang-19+0x581ea75)
#34 0x0000558536bf7a1a clang::CodeGen::CodeGenModule::EmitGlobal(clang::GlobalDecl) (/home/nathan/tmp/cvise.YrEYUS5WBZ/install/llvm-bad/bin/clang-19+0x5823a1a)
#35 0x0000558536bf13e2 clang::CodeGen::CodeGenModule::EmitTopLevelDecl(clang::Decl*) (/home/nathan/tmp/cvise.YrEYUS5WBZ/install/llvm-bad/bin/clang-19+0x581d3e2)
#36 0x0000558537240fbc (anonymous namespace)::CodeGeneratorImpl::HandleTopLevelDecl(clang::DeclGroupRef) ModuleBuilder.cpp:0:0
#37 0x0000558537237057 clang::BackendConsumer::HandleTopLevelDecl(clang::DeclGroupRef) (/home/nathan/tmp/cvise.YrEYUS5WBZ/install/llvm-bad/bin/clang-19+0x5e63057)
#38 0x00005585386c199a clang::ParseAST(clang::Sema&, bool, bool) (/home/nathan/tmp/cvise.YrEYUS5WBZ/install/llvm-bad/bin/clang-19+0x72ed99a)
#39 0x00005585376ca08d clang::FrontendAction::Execute() (/home/nathan/tmp/cvise.YrEYUS5WBZ/install/llvm-bad/bin/clang-19+0x62f608d)
#40 0x000055853762e7ad clang::CompilerInstance::ExecuteAction(clang::FrontendAction&) (/home/nathan/tmp/cvise.YrEYUS5WBZ/install/llvm-bad/bin/clang-19+0x625a7ad)
#41 0x00005585377a673c clang::ExecuteCompilerInvocation(clang::CompilerInstance*) (/home/nathan/tmp/cvise.YrEYUS5WBZ/install/llvm-bad/bin/clang-19+0x63d273c)
#42 0x0000558534a3220a cc1_main(llvm::ArrayRef<char const*>, char const*, void*) (/home/nathan/tmp/cvise.YrEYUS5WBZ/install/llvm-bad/bin/clang-19+0x365e20a)
#43 0x0000558534a2e85d ExecuteCC1Tool(llvm::SmallVectorImpl<char const*>&, llvm::ToolContext const&) driver.cpp:0:0
#44 0x0000558537454199 void llvm::function_ref<void ()>::callback_fn<clang::driver::CC1Command::Execute(llvm::ArrayRef<std::optional<llvm::StringRef>>, std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char>>*, bool*) const::$_0>(long) Job.cpp:0:0
#45 0x00005585369510e6 llvm::CrashRecoveryContext::RunSafely(llvm::function_ref<void ()>) (/home/nathan/tmp/cvise.YrEYUS5WBZ/install/llvm-bad/bin/clang-19+0x557d0e6)
#46 0x0000558537453833 clang::driver::CC1Command::Execute(llvm::ArrayRef<std::optional<llvm::StringRef>>, std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char>>*, bool*) const (/home/nathan/tmp/cvise.YrEYUS5WBZ/install/llvm-bad/bin/clang-19+0x607f833)
#47 0x000055853740b427 clang::driver::Compilation::ExecuteCommand(clang::driver::Command const&, clang::driver::Command const*&, bool) const (/home/nathan/tmp/cvise.YrEYUS5WBZ/install/llvm-bad/bin/clang-19+0x6037427)
#48 0x000055853740b987 clang::driver::Compilation::ExecuteJobs(clang::driver::JobList const&, llvm::SmallVectorImpl<std::pair<int, clang::driver::Command const*>>&, bool) const (/home/nathan/tmp/cvise.YrEYUS5WBZ/install/llvm-bad/bin/clang-19+0x6037987)
#49 0x000055853742e0e9 clang::driver::Driver::ExecuteCompilation(clang::driver::Compilation&, llvm::SmallVectorImpl<std::pair<int, clang::driver::Command const*>>&) (/home/nathan/tmp/cvise.YrEYUS5WBZ/install/llvm-bad/bin/clang-19+0x605a0e9)
#50 0x0000558534a2dcfd clang_main(int, char**, llvm::ToolContext const&) (/home/nathan/tmp/cvise.YrEYUS5WBZ/install/llvm-bad/bin/clang-19+0x3659cfd)
#51 0x0000558534a3f806 main (/home/nathan/tmp/cvise.YrEYUS5WBZ/install/llvm-bad/bin/clang-19+0x366b806)
#52 0x00007f3d209a6c88 (/usr/lib/libc.so.6+0x25c88)
#53 0x00007f3d209a6d4c __libc_start_main (/usr/lib/libc.so.6+0x25d4c)
#54 0x0000558534a2c125 _start (/home/nathan/tmp/cvise.YrEYUS5WBZ/install/llvm-bad/bin/clang-19+0x3658125)
clang: error: clang frontend command failed with exit code 134 (use -v to see invocation)
ClangBuiltLinux clang version 19.0.0git (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project.git 1f6f97e2b64a9c4c51712d32b53e07d2a20e0cc0)
Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Thread model: posix
InstalledDir: /home/nathan/tmp/cvise.YrEYUS5WBZ/install/llvm-bad/bin
Build config: +assertions
clang: note: diagnostic msg: Error generating preprocessed source(s) - no preprocessable inputs.

@bwendling
Copy link
Collaborator Author

bwendling commented Jul 22, 2024 via email

@bwendling
Copy link
Collaborator Author

bwendling commented Jul 22, 2024 via email

@efriedma-quic
Copy link
Collaborator

Empty fields sometimes don't have a corresponding LLVM field number, in order to make the layout work correctly. We slightly extended the cases where this applies recently; see #96422.

@bwendling
Copy link
Collaborator Author

So is it enough to test if the FieldDecl exists in the CGRecordLayout before asking for the FieldNo? When I do that, there are some other subtle changes that occur, though maybe those are from other changes...

@efriedma-quic
Copy link
Collaborator

If a field doesn't correspond to an LLVM field, it has to be empty. Which should mean it's irrelevant to this calculation, I think.

@bwendling
Copy link
Collaborator Author

That was my thinking too. I'll send a PR for people to gaze at. I'm concerned about some of the changes to the test (technically, there should be none, but I've seen this happen before).

bwendling added a commit to bwendling/llvm-project that referenced this pull request Jul 23, 2024
A FieldDecl that's an empty struct may not show up in CGRecordLayout. Go
ahead and ignore such a field as it shouldn't make a difference to these
calculations.

Fixes: 1f6f97e ("[Clang] Loop over FieldDecls instead of all Decls (llvm#99574)")
bwendling added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 23, 2024
…0040)

A FieldDecl that's an empty struct may not show up in CGRecordLayout. Go
ahead and ignore such a field as it shouldn't make a difference to these
calculations.

Fixes: 1f6f97e ("[Clang] Loop over FieldDecls instead of all Decls (#99574)")
Co-authored-by: Eli Friedman <[email protected]>
yuxuanchen1997 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 25, 2024
Summary:
Only FieldDecls are important when determining GEP indices. A struct
defined within another struct has the same semantics as if it were
defined outside of the struct. So there's no need to look into
RecordDecls that aren't a field.

See commit 5bcf31e ("[Clang] Loop over FieldDecls instead of all
Decls (#89453)")

Fixes 2039.

Test Plan: 

Reviewers: 

Subscribers: 

Tasks: 

Tags: 


Differential Revision: https://phabricator.intern.facebook.com/D60250945
yuxuanchen1997 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 25, 2024
…0040)

A FieldDecl that's an empty struct may not show up in CGRecordLayout. Go
ahead and ignore such a field as it shouldn't make a difference to these
calculations.

Fixes: 1f6f97e ("[Clang] Loop over FieldDecls instead of all Decls (#99574)")
Co-authored-by: Eli Friedman <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

clang:codegen IR generation bugs: mangling, exceptions, etc. clang Clang issues not falling into any other category

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants